Fri 19 Oct 2020
This post has been contributed by one of our regular readers. If you too would like to suggest an article for Slow Leadership, we would be delighted to hear from you. Please contact us at [email protected].
Knowing thyself requires an in-depth understanding of “who I am.” and “how I am.” This understanding is the product of the formal and informal experiences of living life. But this understanding is not the result of simply “having” experiences, but is the result of deep, consistent and conscious reflection on one’s experiences, i.e., lessons learned (the good, the bad and the ugly).
Self-awareness most often arises after experiencing an inner conflict which tugs on our sleeve and forces us to change. One of the results of such change is a revised value system reflecting new ways of thinking, being and doing.
Examples of experiences that bring us to know thyself are mid-life crises (which now seem to begin at 30!), health issues, relationship issues, career issues, financial issues and mental, emotional or psychological issues such heart attacks, divorces and failed relationships, loss of job, bankruptcy, stress, rust-out, burnout, depression and addictions to chemical and non-chemical substances (e.g., food, alcohol, exercise, blogging, etc).
Knowing thyself at work
In the workplace environment, organizational awareness is the totality of each employee’s self-awareness. Where employees are more self-aware, workplace conflict can be minimal and constructive. But in a workplace environment, where the majority of employees are non-self-aware, workplace conflict can be insidious, toxic, all-pervasive and destructive.
The bottom line is that the way your organization, department, or team handles interpersonal conflict can either be an experience of aliveness, vitality, and camaraderie—or toxicity, demoralization, resentment, and disrespect.
The major cause of “loss processes” in organizations is not due to processes but is more often caused by dysfunctional interpersonal dynamics. More and more in today’s organizations, success and effectiveness are dependent on the synergies that are created when people are in alignment with one another.
When folks’ attitudes, beliefs, and values are in alignment, their behaviors are consonant and supportive of departmental, team and organizational goals. When one is driven by self-limiting and self-defeating personal biases, beliefs and assumptions—all of which are unspoken and often unconscious—discord most often rules.
This discord rules and ruins the day, ruins meetings, ruins processes, and ruins relationships until folks agree to “out the elephants” in the room and consciously deal with the dysfunctional behaviors that underlie conflict.
When leaders and managers have the courage to understand that “soft skills” are really the “hard skills” of effective relationships at work (and do the work that’s required to bring people to that level of awareness), turf and ego issues will begin to be metabolized in a manner that bring people to feel freer in their behaviors and in a way that fosters greater mutual respect for one another.
How to start
The process of knowing thyself begins when one consciously explores “how I am” and “who I am” when it comes to “the way I am”—the way I communicate, how I behave with others.
Self mastery consciously explores verbal and non verbal behaviors, emotional behaviors—how one expresses one’s feelings and emotions (and if one expresses one’s feelings and emotions), and motives and intentions underneath —hidden agendas, for example, or disharmony where “what I do is out of alignment with what I say”.
Know thyself requires taking a conscious look at:
- How we experience ourselves at work and how we interact with others.
- The disconnects that exist between what we say, think, feel, and do; disconnects that lead to us being out of harmony, being unethical, and being disrespectful.
- Why, for example, I need to lie, cheat, steal, bully, gossip, be disagreeable, disrespectful, resistant, non-trusting, sabotaging, discourteous, and insensitive.
- “Where I’m coming from” and whether “where I’m coming from” is supportive or limiting to the team, department and organization.
The bottom line is this: conflict is rarely the result of “technical” issues. Most often, conflict is based on some underlying fear and is an interpersonal dynamics issue.
Removing the sources of conflict
People choose to relate to one another on the basis of a “task orientation” or on the basis of a “relationship orientation.” Task orientation focuses on functions, roles and strategies. Relationship orientation focuses on trust, openness, honesty and respect.
Effective conflict resolution must rest on the fulcrum of relationship orientation—on people, not processes. Organizational self-awareness occurs when the majority of employees are engaged, consciously, from the perspective of relationship orientation, i.e., “who I am” and “how I am” at work, and not solely on “what I do”.
A self-aware person is one who examines the quality of his/her interpersonal relationships on a consistent basis. A self-aware organization is one that examines the quality of its interpersonal dynamic on a regular basis.
To be an ever effective leader or manager, this exploration that leads to supporting people to actively and consciously engage in personal growth would serve us well in an effort to reduce the negative effects of workplace conflict.
In other words, focusing on the “technical” alone won’t do it—never has, never will.
Peter Vajda, Ph.D, C.P.C. is a founding partner of SpiritHeart, an Atlanta-based company that supports conscious living through coaching, counseling and facilitating. With a practice based on the dynamic intersection of mind, body, emotion and spirit that is, Essential Well BE-ing Peters approach focuses on personal, business, relational and spiritual coaching. He is a professional speaker and published author. For more information, www.spiritheart.net or contact pvajda (AT) spiritheart.net or phone 770.804.9125
(c) 2007, Peter G. Vajda, Ph.D. and SpiritHeart. All rights in all media reserved.
Technorati Tags: Knowing thyself, reflection, Self-awareness, organizational awareness, mutual respect, interpersonal dynamics, conflict resolution,
Popularity: 48% [?]
Related posts:
- Why your flawed notion of change may be holding you back
- The seven secrets to vision
- Listing the sins of macho management
- Trust begins at home
- Why procrastination is sometimes the very best course of action
- The teacher, the servant, and the tea
2 Responses to “Knowing thyself reduces conflict”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax. Check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID =]
select count(*) as comments from wp_comments where comment_author_email = (select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID = 164)
October 19th, 2007 at 9:45 am
WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax. Check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID =]
select count(*) as comments from wp_comments where comment_author_email = (select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID = 164)
There is a tendency to put blame on an individual when the problem is structural. You start the article with the notion of understanding “who I am.” But what does that mean?
Have you noticed how so many people self identify with their jobs, titles, and education? It bears some consideration this idea of the person. If I understand correctly, you are suggesting a person is a set of behaviors.
I would like you to expand on your point about organizational awareness is the totality of each employee’s awareness. What does that mean? Are you talking about maturity here?
Are you suggesting people are invested in their work to the exclusion of all else in life? Which people are they? And if they are that dull, you simply can’t go telling them to be different.
Plato tells a story of people chained in a cave. All they see is reflections on the wall and take that to be real life. But he asserts, if someone were to walk out of the cave in the harsh light of day and see reality and be foolish enough to come back into the cave and tell the others that their reality is not reality at all, they would kill him.
Who is this article aimed at? In a corporate structure it seems to me that those who wish to stay in a structure must tread with care and insight in order to cooperate with people of diverse perspectives and needs. I prefer the word cooperate because managing seems to me to demean those that are managed.
WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax. Check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID =]
select count(*) as comments from wp_comments where comment_author_email = (select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID = 166)
October 19th, 2007 at 11:35 am
WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax. Check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID =]
select count(*) as comments from wp_comments where comment_author_email = (select comment_author_email from wp_comments where comment_ID = 166)
Although I’m all for knowing thyself. I have to agree with Christopher when he says: “There is a tendency to put blame on an individual when the problem is structural.” My blog is dedicated to discussing this very issue.
Yes, I think knowing yourself can help you deal with conflict more gracefully once it erupts but I do NOT believe that within organizations: “The bottom line is this: conflict is rarely the result of “technical” issues. Most often, conflict is based on some underlying fear and is an interpersonal dynamics issue.”
I think much conflict in organizations erupts from unclear accountabilities and authorities, once clarified conflict lowers. Conflict also erupts when employees are underemployed, once fully employed, cynical employees become engaged. Conflict also erupts when employees are asked to work for a manager who does not add value to their thinking, once provided with appropriate leadership, insubordinate employees become respectful.
I’ve seen it. I’ve lived it.
I’m OK. You’re OK. Let’s fix the system.